276°
Posted 20 hours ago

Kjver Sword Study Bible Giant Print Black Genuine Leather Indexed: King James Version Easy Read

£9.9£99Clearance
ZTS2023's avatar
Shared by
ZTS2023
Joined in 2023
82
63

About this deal

And when they were come into the house, they saw the young child with Mary his mother, and fell down, and worshipped him: and when they had opened their treasures, they presented unto him gifts; gold, and frankincense, and myrrh.

Let a little water, I pray you, be fetched , and wash your feet, and rest yourselves under the tree:The HOLY SPIRIT which resides in me was shaken, upset with this violation of the HOLY BIBLE. KJV. I was angry, I cried tears, I prayed to GOD for an answer as to why the devil infiltrated with his lies and deceipt the translation process of GODs word. And I will fetch a morsel of bread, and comfort ye your hearts; after that ye shall pass on: for therefore are ye come to your servant. And they said, So do, as thou hast said. dictionary remains unchanged as well. I noted in my previous comments that this was not as critical to me

When it comes to completely defining the difference between the KJV and NKJV, using linguist specialists would be applicable. use both nkjv and nkjv in a parallel bible and compare scripture to scripture of both and if I find discrepancies I follow the nkjv. To me the nkjv is easier to read. but by doing this many of the words in the KJV. have been easier to understand. The KJVER in Hebrews 4:8 places a defined footnote for the word "Jesus" as being the name of "Joshua." Some Modern Translations outright change this verse to say “Joshua” instead of “Jesus.” While the name “Jesus“ could be defined possibly as “Joshua,” the proper rendering in the text here is "Jesus" in Hebrews 4:8 because it was Jesus who gave Joshua the battle plan to take down the city wall of Jericho, and AI. For Joshua encountered a Pre-Incarnate Christ in Joshua 5:13-15. An example of this, if we were to use the Law of First Mention (means, whenever a word is used for the first time in the bible, it has it’s greatest meaning). As you can imagine, Genesis is a wealth of “first mentions” and Chapter 1 of Genesis includes basic fundamental OT insight… nothing more than the first verse of Genesis 1.

Weight and Dimensions

I agree with you. But “1 John 5:7” wasn’t accepted by Erasmus of Rotterdam, he could’t find a supporting greek manuscript. People wanted it in, and Erasmus said he would include it if they could show him a manuscript. Probably a manuscript was created, for that purpose. Resources to enhance your biblical study are included, such as articles on the names and attributes of God, biblical terms and definitions, historical outlines, an extensive concordance, and detailed maps. Also the special Topical Concordance of Biblical Words, found at the end of this Bible, will provide countless aids for locating desired subjects and verses. The KJVER® Bible brings to life the King James Version, making it easier to use and understand. Matthew 5: 18 For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.

Acts 11:28 KJV says, “and signified by the s pirit that there should be great dearth throughout all the world:” It should also be stated that the KJV was written entirely based upon the exclusion of the Alexandrian Manuscripts. The NKJV includes the Alexandrian Manuscripts in an effort to find more potent and direct information. Translation of the Alexandrian Manuscripts is rejected by most KJV followers. Thematic study guide with over three thousand margin notes covering more than ninety topics providing a years' worth of study that takes the reader from cover to cover of the Bible That is correct. It uses the traditional text or received text(TR). This is a well known and researched fact. It is also documented in the preface to the NKJV. Mrk. 4:19 KJV says, “And the cares of this world, and the deceitfulness of riches, and the lusts of other things entering in, choke the word, and it becometh unfruitful.”Phil. 3:8 KJVER says, “for whom I have suffered the loss of all things, and do count them but dung, that I may win Christ,” rubbish ......................................................................................................... Philippians 3:8 KJVER has the word “dung” defined as “rubbish” in the footnote. Poop and trash are both bad but poop is far worse. If a man pooped in his trashcan it would stink up the house. If he tried to put his trash down the toilet, it would clog it up. So no. They are not the same thing. Why do the translators here think they are the same thing? .............................................................................................................................. God’s written Words-The Holy Scriptures which we commonly call The Bible are inerrant, infallible in the original writings. Now man is not perfect, but fallible; -this is true. -God’s Word says this over and over. Thus no translation man performed is perfect but fallible. Just stating the obvious. There are English versions in the 1500’s also. Not that English is the ultimate language of the world. Not many since 1611 read this, this way: Cor. 3:12 KJVER says, “Seeing then that we have such hope, we use great plainness of speech:” boldness .........................................................................................................2 Corinthians 3:12 KJVER casts doubt on the word “plainness” of speech to “boldness” of speech in the footnotes. The words “Plainness” and “boldness” do not have the same meaning. Nowhere will you find the word “bold” in the definition for the word “plain” in the old Webster’s 1913 dictionary. I believe Modern Translation adherents are trying to cover up the fact that they don’t use the plainness of speech because they constantly refer to the original ancient languages. Over 5,500 Greek New Testament Bible manuscripts exist today. Most—the reliable Antiochian Traditional Text—support the King James Bible. The one percent of remaining manuscripts—the corrupt Alexandrian Critical Text—agrees with modern Bibles. The perfect King James Bible is based on the Textus Receptus, God’s preserved Word (New Testament) from Antioch, Syria (see Acts 11:26). The Textus Receptus (Latin for “received text”) has its roots in the apostles’ original manuscripts. Modern Bibles are based on a handful of corrupt manuscripts (chiefly, Codices Vaticanus and Sinaiticus). For every tree is known by his own fruit. For of thorns men do not gather figs, nor of a bramble bush gather they grapes.

Asda Great Deal

Free UK shipping. 15 day free returns.
Community Updates
*So you can easily identify outgoing links on our site, we've marked them with an "*" symbol. Links on our site are monetised, but this never affects which deals get posted. Find more info in our FAQs and About Us page.
New Comment