Time to Think: The Inside Story of the Collapse of the Tavistock's Gender Service for Children

Product Information

Time to Think shows what happens when the exponents of an ideology, so certain of its righteousness, capture a field of medicine, silencing critics, refusing even to collect follow-up data on whether its treatments actually work’– The Times Best Books of 2023 So Far

Time to Think, The Inside Story of the Collapse of the

Many of them were same-sex attracted – the same was true for the boys attending GIDS – and many were autistic. Their lives were complicated too,” Barnes writes. In 1994 GIDS became part of The “Tavi” and by 2009 had a new director, Dr Polly Carmichael. Yet by July 2022, following Dr Hilary Cass’s report, GIDS was deemed neither a safe nor viable option for young people with gender-related stress and it was closed down. It's also striking that it took till 2019 for GIDS to have a standard operating procedure around safeguarding. And that was one of the results of the review. But to have operated for 30 years without seemingly the feeling that there needed to be one, I think is interesting. And then not to include your safeguarding lead for children, so Sonia says, in the drafting of it is also rather striking.I think the clinical dilemmas stem from the fact that the evidence base is weak and that the existing weak evidence base has been used on a very different group of young people from that for whom it was designed. So, GIDS have actually been open about the fact that they extended the so-called Dutch protocol, which was designed for a group of young people who were psychologically stable, who had gender incongruence from childhood, who had stable supportive living environments. They extended that medical pathway and the evidence for it, if you like, to a group of young people who didn't fit those criteria, whose gender incongruence started in adolescence, who had multiple other difficulties that they were contending with, and who sometimes had quite chaotic living arrangements. And we've seen that shift in the people presenting to gender clinics across the western world. So, I think it's the uncertainty surrounding the evidence base and the fact that the one-size-fits-all approach doesn't seem to be working. I don't know if that's answering your question. Sorry! But this isn’t to say that ideology wasn’t also in the air. Another of Barnes’s interviewees is Dr Kirsty Entwistle, an experienced clinical psychologist. When she got a job at Gids’ Leeds outpost, she told her new colleagues she didn’t have a gender identity. “I’m just female,” she said. This, she was informed, was transphobic. Barnes is rightly reluctant to ascribe the Gids culture primarily to ideology, but nevertheless, many of the clinicians she interviewed used the same word to describe it: mad.

Hannah Barnes Swift Press | Hannah Barnes

This incredibly important book shows that we still don’t know how many children were damaged for life. I want every institution and every politician who pontificates about gender to read this book and ask what happened to all those lost girls and boys – and why they were complicit’ – Daily Telegraph What is most inexcusable in this story is the fact that the failures of the early days of the service have simply been repeated down the years. The GIDS not only failed to take account of its own data, learn from it and put in place structures to ensure a safe service for children, it doubled down, allowing pressure from activists to dictate. The service became increasingly ideological, not less. Sue Evans, who was working at the service around the time of the audit says in the book “I didn’t come across simple cases.”

You appear to be using an old version of Internet Explorer.

I want every institution and every politician who pontificates about gender to read this book and ask what happened to all those lost girls and boys – and why they were complicit.