The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine

Product Information

Rozsika Parker, “The Domestication of Embroidery.” in The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine. (London: I.B. Tauris, 2010), 60-82. Tate Modern’s recent Anni Albers (1899-1994) exhibition, curated by Ann Coxon and Briony Fer, demonstrated Albers’ role as an important artist in Modernism through her weavings, which she began in the 1920s Bauhaus workshops and developed through her exposure to ancient Latin American weavings once she moved to the US in the 1930s. These early civilization weavings and textiles that Albers immersed herself in can be seen as a form of communication, coding and language. Lilah Fowler, who is interested in our geopolitical space within today’s digital culture, worked with a computer programmer to produce custom software that created unlimited and unique digital patterns. Learning the technique of Navajo weaving, she first created hand-woven rugs from the digital information of hundreds of generated patterns, and then used a digital Jacquard loom. Early looms were often seen as early computers, in the way they read information to weave designs via holes punched in cards. El libro parece bien documentado y aunque no se extienda demasiado en su argumentación, tampoco parece irreflexivo o caprichoso en sus hipótesis. Sobre todo se agradece que, siendo la autora terapeuta de orientación psicoanalítica, no se deslice más que en un par de ocasiones, y de manera bastante leve, en la ensalada freudiana (yo al menos lo agradezco).

The Subversive Stitch Embroidery | PDF - Scribd PARKER, R. - The Subversive Stitch Embroidery | PDF - Scribd

McBrinn’s aim, to redress the absence of documentation about male needleworkers, draws attention to the men who choose needlework as a hobby or creative pastime for its pleasure, satisfaction or medium-for-a-message. His interest is not in Savile Row tailors, male garment factory workers, sailors occupying themselves at sea or male members of embroidery guilds before the advent of the Industrial Revolution. These occupations carry no sexual stigma. Instead, by identifying male practitioners and recovering their work, McBrinn deftly reminds readers, by means of needlework, that “the social construction of masculinity – [is] something that only really exists in relation to femininity” (xvii). This means that a boy or man who prefers stitching over rugby or boxing is stigmatized as effeminate (having or showing characteristics regarded as typical of a woman), queer (not normal), “sissies or ‘fags’” (108). By coincidence, one of the definitions of faggot, from which “fag” derives, in the Oxford English Dictionary is “an embroidered or painted figure of a faggot, which people regarded as heretics … were obliged to wear on their sleeve.” In other words, a stitched emblem.

Very excited to announce that I will be showcasing my Honours Collection at New Zealand Fashion week this year! Recent Posts

The Subversive Stitch, Rozsika Parker – Anna Vidal Honours 2020 The Subversive Stitch, Rozsika Parker – Anna Vidal Honours 2020

Access-restricted-item true Addeddate 2012-07-27 20:19:58 Bookplateleaf 0002 Boxid IA160019 Camera Canon EOS 5D Mark II City London Donor I’ve wanted to read this book for a while but to be honest as it is hailed as a piece of academic feminist literature I was put off. I expected it to be wordy, heavy going and worthy but to my relief it is none of these things. Yes it is academic but the writing style flows and is always engaging, full of evidenced based opinion.I know from personal experience how little people appreciate handcrafts and how if I quote a fair price for embroidery work that people are surprised. This is an interesting look at how embroidery became the domain of both those who had to be seen to be doing something and the cause of suffering in some factories. As a women and a textile artist I am intensely interested in the group I belong to and its history. Parker describes the activity of Lady Julia Calverley who in the early first half of the 18 th century embroidered for 50 years literally covering everything from slippers to wall hangings with stitch. To me this signals what little else she had to do but also the addictive nature of sewing. I am sure I’m not the only one who has felt that one more row or patch or line led to yet another late into the night. In the introduction to the latest edition the author discusses the work and impact of Louise Bourgeois. Like me Parker feels the work of Louise Bourgeois has done a lot to bring textiles to within high art and suggests that her work has also led to a deeper understanding of women’s expression through textiles. Reading this book has enabled me to look at embroidery from the past and present in a more informed way. I had read this many years ago, but had decided it would be timely to reread this since I have been reading books like Craftivism, Bibliocraft, Strange material and the Bayeaux Tapestry. This one really did come first, and those other titles follow very worthily. It is a bit dated, but still a very strong book to read, and much of the anger over historical depictions is still very valid. It is still necessary reading (well, at least very strongly suggested reading) after reading some of the titles listed earlier in the review. The prequel to, provocateur of, and title inspiration for McBrinn’s book was Rozsika Parker’s The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Making of the Feminine (1984). Parker’s treatise was an important craft history text and a feminist polemic on women’s art. Pennina Barnett and Jennifer Harris [1] summarized Parker’s contribution to the art and craft canon: “In this ground-breaking study she mapped the decline in the status of embroidery from the Middle Ages to the nineteenth century: from a high art form practised by both men and women, particularly in England, to one that was seen as lowly and feminine—and from an admired professional art to a marginalised domestic craft.” [2] The Subversive Stitch identified the male presence in British textile activities as historical (i.e Opus Anglicanum), and rare from the Victorian era forward. McBrinn notes in Chapter 1 that Parker quoted an Office of National Statistics (UK) report (c. 1979) wherein only two percent of British men engaged in needlework.

The Subversive Stitch Revisited - A Companion to Textile The Subversive Stitch Revisited - A Companion to Textile

This book tells the history of embroidery. It shows how useful embroidery is to get to know the history of women or how similar it remains to other art forms such as painting.The Subversive Stitch: embroidery and the making of the feminine by Rozsika Parker published by I. B. Tauris Masculinity and “the politics of cloth”: from the “bad boys” of postmodern art to the “the boys that sew club” of the new millennium I really, really enjoyed this look at embroidery and the making of the feminine throughout (mostly English) history. I give it 4 stars only because it would have really been improved by colour photos at a higher resolution...but this re-issue is very fine otherwise. Rozsika Parker's now classic re-evaluation of the reciprocal relationship between women and embroidery has brought stitchery out from the private world of female domesticity into the fine arts, created a major breakthrough in art history and criticism, and fostered the emergence of today's dynamic and expanding crafts movements.

The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the Rozsika Parker, The Subversive Stitch: Embroidery and the

Joseph McBrinn is Reader in Art and Design History at Belfast School of Art, Ulster University in Belfast, Northern Ireland.Rambles a bit but this is an interesting (if currently dated) look at Embroidery and how in many ways it has come to define a certain level of femininity. How it went from being a career to being an acceptable way for women to pass their time and how it has been diminished by both men and women. I can't remember how I came across this book, but I couldn't resist putting it on the list for our feminist book club, and was very happy when it got voted in for discussion. When I started reading it, I got a little apprehensive, since it seemed extremely academic and rather niche, and I was worried that the group (and I) wouldn't enjoy it. So many ideas to follow up on from this read; Parker did mention some newer textile artists in her new introduction, and I'd love to read about the path of embroidery past the late 70s where this book stops.