Grief Journal : I Will Always Wonder Who You Would Have Been: Pregnancy, Infant, Baby, and Child Loss ~ 6x9 College Ruled Notebook

Product Information

It will be the case that o is F at t iff a true, complete answer-at- t to the question Is o F at t? is that o is F at t. Let us again consider the evil scientist’s promise. A natural way of understanding the promise on the Supervaluationist account is to take it as involving truth and falsity as defined on the account. Suppose the evil scientist promises that he will torture me iff (NA24) is true and send me on a holiday iff (NA24) is false. Given such a promise, wondering would clearly be inappropriate. Knowing that (NA24) is a future contingent, I know that it is satisfied in some histories and unsatisfied in others. So I know that (NA24) is not true, and so I know that I will not be tortured. Footnote 34 And so understanding the promise in this way makes wondering about future contingents inappropriate.

Three days prior to that life-altering decision, I was admitted to the hospital with stroke-level blood pressures that sent everyone into action and panic immediately. My condition was a mystery to the doctors for a few days while I underwent every scan, test, and lab under the sun to figure out why I was so ill. After days of this, my incredible maternal-fetal medicine doctor came to me with her theory, but it took a little more time for everything to unfold because what she told us was so unfathomable, rare, and heartbreaking. I was essentially carrying an undetected twin pregnancy with a complete molar pregnancy alongside our growing Maya. Given that my focus in this paper is on wondering whether with polar questions as their content, we can state an ignorance norm for wondering whether that is entailed by (IN) as follows: (WIN1): I think about you from time to time; I wonder where you are now and if you ever think about me, too.I remember wishing I had waited to tell anyone, because I couldn’t bear to have to explain what happened. I couldn’t bear to be asked when the baby was due again or when I was going to find out the sex. I just wanted to never talk about it ever again. You get all this education on how to have a healthy baby, but no one prepares you on how to handle a miscarriage. It wasn't long before We were called in,after asking a few questions regarding why we were opting for an early scan, the sonographer typed "maternal reassurance"as the reason. So We began, the flat screen mounted on the wall right in front of us, we waited anxiously to see our baby forthe first time. The wondering doesn’t take away my joy. It doesn’t steal my delight in the children I have. In the midst of the daily crazy that is my life, I often don’t stop to think about it. But the journey of infertility has woven the wondering into my heart, this quiet ache for the children who might have been, the missing of my children in Heaven, and the gap between my children on Earth that is bigger than I had hoped it would be. Todd, P., & Rabern, B. (2021). Future contingents and the logic of temporal omniscience. Noûs, 55(1), 102–127. Enter guilt, my thoughts in response to these words: "What is wrong with me? Why am I upset when it was early and other women are obviously able to get over it without much fuss. "

My doctor’s phone lay on my chest playing “Rescue” by Lauren Daigle as I faded off to sleep. I can’t even begin to recount how well we were cared for by my medical team and the love we felt there. Our whole world stopped as doctors saved my life, my body fought, and we said goodbye to our beloved daughter. RELATED: God Actually Does Give Us More Than We Can Handle Like I've told you before; I missed you while you were here. I'll miss you when you're gone. I'll miss you when I'm standing with you. But most of all, I miss, us. I can't sit here and name all the things we've done together. You know that it'd take way too long to do. I never sit here and cry about what we used to be. I sit here and laugh about what we could be in the future. You make me laugh even when I'm not talking to you. There is something about you that I just can't get over. The fact that you do look like a girl still gets me every time. I'm just playing with ya, I love you. You know that. We may have questioned it and had some pretty rough times. But we made it through. And in the end, I think you could say we were the best couple we could be. We lasted and didn't break up for stupid reasons. Friedman, J. (2013). Question-directed attitudes*. Philosophical Perspectives, 27(1), 145–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/phpe.12026 That doesn’t mean I am not content, or that I am not thankful for the children God has given me. I am, very much! I love the life I have, and am overjoyed at the blessing of being their mom.Thoughts of you cloud my mind during the most inconvenient times. I think of you when I’m sipping my morning coffee, wondering if you’d take cream in yours. I think of you when I’m in the shower as water is rushing down my face, wondering if I’m the reason nothing ever works out for me. I think of you when I’m alone in a crowded place, wondering if you’d proudly be walking through unknown faces with my hand in yours. It may seem that if at moment m it is sensible to wonder whether A, then it must be that either A is settled true at m, or that A is settled false at m. More generally, it may seem that if one is to be able, at m, properly to raise the question whether A, then A must be either settled true or settled false...No matter how things eventuate, the question posed on Monday, “Will there be a sea battle tomorrow?” will be answered. If there is a sea battle on Tuesday, then we may say, “The answer to the question is definitely ‘yes’.”; while if on Tuesday there is no sea battle, then we may say, “The answer to the question is definitely ‘no’.” We should therefore not reject the Monday question as badly posed. It is perfectly correct on Monday to say something like “We cannot yet provide a settled answer to that question, but must wait and see” (Belnap et al., 2001, 176). Hartshorne, C. (1941). Man’s vision of god, and the logic of theism (Vol. OCLC, p. 1456831). Willett, Clark & Co. Bourne, C. (2004). Future contingents, non-contradiction, and the law of excluded middle muddle. Analysis, 64(2), 122–128. The sentence structure I wonder [X] is declarative. The X is usually a noun clause that is the object of the verb wonder.

Part of me will always wonder if it was truly me or if someone else was in the picture, was she an ex or a new fling? Was she my replacement or was I hers? Could she have loved you the way I wanted to? https://www.etsy.com/listing/741745033/mega-bundle-big-huge-bundle-clipart-on?ref=shop_home_active_12&pro=1 How else might the Supervaluationist explain the appropriateness of wondering about future contingents? Interestingly, for a Supervaluationist, betting that the sodium-24 atom will decay tomorrow is not the same as betting that it is true that the sodium-24 atom will decay tomorrow. Footnote 35 Given that (NA24) is a future contingent, a Supervaluationist would be foolish to take the second bet. What about the first? Given the nonequivalence between \(\upvarphi\) and \(\upvarphi\) is true, what if we take my wondering to be not whether it is true that the sodium-24 atom will decay tomorrow, but rather whether the sodium-24 atom will decay tomorrow? Given the Supervaluationist account of future contingents, would wondering be appropriate in this case?

I Was There to Walk My Mother to Heaven

I smiled and said, "Well sure that's just life isn't it".Leaving the hospital I felt so numb, so cold, so lonely. My husband put his arm around me, I wrapped my arms tightly around my abdomen. I felt so empty, so hollow. In our example, (EGGS) is satisfied in h2 and fails to be satisfied in h1 and h3 because Nicola has eggs for breakfast in h2 and not in h1 and h3. The second step of the process involves supervaluating over histories. A statement is true at m just in case it is satisfied in every history that contains m: We can distinguish between true and false answers to a question. Both a and b are true answers to A, and c is a false answer to A. Furthermore, a is a true partial answer to A, whereas b is a true complete answer to A: b completely and truly answers A: it states that Neil Armstrong, Michael Collins and Buzz Aldrin flew in the Apollo 11 mission and no one else did. True, complete answers are the logically strongest true answers entailing all partial answers. It wasn’t you, as painfully cliché as it is, it’s true. It wasn’t you, it was never you – it was always me. I’m the one who isn’t ready for love. I’m not the one who wants goodbye kisses or to be strolling through the store holding hands, I’m not the one who wants to depend on someone, I’m not the one who is ready to give up my single life where all I know how to do is take up space. Trying to make room for someone else isn’t on my to-do list this week or anytime soon. Necessarily, if Q is a question pertaining to time t2 and one knows at t1 a true, complete answer-at- t2 to Q, then one ought not wonder at t1 whether Q. Footnote 41

I'm stretching out of reach, but you're just out too far. I've got my arms wide open, waiting for that hug you promised me before you'd leave. I'm still waiting for Friday to happen, the day you were supposed to see me before you moved. I'll always be waiting for more memories to make.

Barnes, E., & Cameron, R. (2009). The open future: Bivalence, determinism and ontology. Philosophical Studies, 146, 291–309. Part of me will always wonder how it’s possible to fake the way you looked at me, how your eyes were the most truthful liars I’ve ever met, how you could look at someone like that and not feel anything. They say your eyes are the window to your soul and I could’ve sworn I’ve seen your soul, I’ve seen your heart, part of me will always wonder how the hell I fell in love with you that night if I hadn’t seen your heart — if I hadn’t felt it. Maybe it would’ve been easier to hate you if I hadn’t seen right through you.