Intel Xeon E5-2697V2 CPU (2.7GHz, 12 Core, 24 Threads, 30MB Cache, LGA

Product Information

Actually this is a bit incorrect. IBM can scale to 131,072 cores on POWER7 if the coherency requirement is forgiven. Oh, and this system can run either AIX or Linux when maxed out. Source: http://www.theregister.co.uk/Print/2009/11/27/ibm_... SMP is based on intra-node communication using memory shared by all cores. A cluster is made up of SMP compute nodes but each node cannot communicate with each other so scaling is limited to a single compute node...." Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon E5-1620 v2. PCIe version

The UV can run any OS that runs on modern x86 hardware today. Windows, Linux, Solaris (Unix) and perhaps at some point NonStop (HP's mainframe OS http://h17007.www1.hp.com/us/en/enterprise/servers... ). The x86 platform has plenty of choices to choose from. The E5-2643 v2 has the most L3 Cache per core of any CPU, at 4.16 MB/core. This is a 10c die offering all 25 MB of L3 cache, but only six cores are active. Reasons for this include database applications that need a large amount of L3 cache per core. For licensing agreements that hinge on per-core pricing, having a larger amount of L3 per core could help save some money by needing fewer cores. TDP ของระบบและ TDP สูงสุดจะกำหนดจากการจำลองสถานการณ์ที่เลวร้ายที่สุด TDP ที่เกิดขึ้นจริงอาจมีค่าต่ำกว่า ถ้าไม่ได้ใช้ I/O ทั้งหมดสำหรับชิปเซ็ต Types, maximum amount and channel quantity of RAM supported by Xeon E5-2697 v2 and Xeon E5-1620 v2.Firstly I would like to say a big thank you to GIGABYTE Server for the opportunity to test these CPUs in their motherboard, the GA-6PXSV3. This motherboard is the focus of a review at a later date. With the greatest performance possible combined with the best temps possible ---- and when one goes out of the Window (usuallly temps)___that is OC finished. Dont you think that a 262.000 core server and 100s of TB of RAM sounds more like a cluster, than a single fat SMP server? And why do the UV line of servers focus on OpenMPI accerators? OpenMPI is never used in SMP workloads, only in HPC." It looks like the system won't take v_core much lower than 1.168v - so 1.125_v is too low factoring in the droop. http://www.intel.com/content/www/th/th/architecture-and-technology/hyper-threading/hyper-threading-technology.html?wapkw=hyper+threading สำหรับข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมรวมถึงรายละเอียดว่ามีโปรเซสเซอร์ใดบ้างที่สนับสนุน Intel® HT Technology

What ever board you are using ---google it for OC'ing and you may find ROG Asus posts for other people gone before mentioning BIOS tweaks.........Again, only partially true. The costs and stuff is correct, but the assumptions that you're writing about is incorrect. SMP is symmetric multiprocessing. BY DEFINITION, that means that "involves a multiprocessor computer hardware and software architecture where two or more identical processors connect to a single, shared main memory, have full access to all I/O devices, and are controlled by a single OS instance that treats all processors equally, reserving none for special purposes." (source: wiki) That means that it is a monolithic system, again, of which, few are TRULY such systems. If you've ever ACTUALLY witnessed the startup/bootup sequence of an ACTUAL IBM mainframe, the rest of the "nodes" are actually booted up typically by PXE or something very similiar to that, and then the "node" is ennumerated into the resource pool. But, for all other intents and purposes, they are semi-independent, standalone systems, because SMP systems do NOT have the capability to pass messages and/or memory calls (reads/writes/requests) without some kind of a transport layer (for example MPI). HPC vendors are increasingly targeting commercial markets, whereas commercial vendors, such as Oracle, SAP and SAS, are seeing HPC requirements." (Source: http://www.information-age.com/it-management/strat... First of all thank you for your time reading this post and I hope so that you will enjoy in content bellow..... Well, it's best to have it in the test bench! so now I can see the max. multiplier in the BIOS is 27 but when it's all fired up x30 is applicable somehow.