Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
Four high-gain external antennas and Beamforming technology combine to extend strong, reliable WiFi throughout your home. Can you guess which one? Yes, it’s that Lenovo laptop which went above the set 150ms immediately and permanently; pretty much all other clients went either slightly above or immediately below this limit for 1% of the time which I suppose can be acceptable. As for the simultaneous web browsing, all remained below the set limit despite the VoIP traffic running alongside it – it seems that the WiFi 6E finally behaved. TP-Link AX5400 AX73 – Multi-client stress test using 5 client devices – 1080p streaming & web browsing & VoIP (5GHz, 80MHz). The focus is on the web browsing. The lower the score, the better. 4K Streaming and Browsing – 5 Client Devices The AX50’s wireless specifications meanwhile are promising, if not exceptional. Its 5GHz radio is rated at 2,402Mbits/sec with the use of 160MHz channels, and 4×4 MU-MIMO helps compatible clients maximise their transfer speeds.
As it’s not intended to be a device providing whole-home coverage, this is fine. For greater coverage, you would want to consider investing in a TP-Link has unveiled the Archer AX53 IPv6 IPoE compliant Wi-Fi 6 router, which provides high-capacity connection without stress even amid congestion. The software side is more ambitious. The AX53 runs TP-Link’s standard router firmware, with largely the same set of features as the company’s flagship models. This means you get not just port forwarding and QoS controls but also some surprisingly advanced options, such as IPv6 and ALG configuration. Those wanting to really take control of their network can configure up to four VLANs and set up static routing. And if this change will increase your quality of life anyway... take your time and look for the product that make you feel safer than now. Only believe than vulnberabilities... will happen. WPA2 is still largely used neverthless has some "incurable flaws" and WPA3 is not a de facto standard.Qam1024. Pretty much just look higher number is possible but also higher number means overlapping and signals smashing into eachother is much more likely so this is often not used to the fullest as its not issue free Without replacing your existing devices or buying a whole new WiFi ecosystem, OneMesh™ helps you create a more flexible network that covers your entire home with TP-Link OneMesh™ products. TP-Link Archer AX55 Review – I haven’t used a TP-Link router for many years so it’s great to actually be able to test and review one of their newest wireless routers, the Archer AX55. TP-Link AX55 is an AX3000 Dual Band Gigabit Wi-Fi 6 router with 2,402Mbps on the 5GHz channel and 574Mbps on the 2.4GHz. To do so, I had to rely on a client device equipped with an AX200 WiFi adapter (TP-Link TX3000E) and on a server device that will be directly connected to the router (via an Ethernet cable). For the first test, I connected the client device to the 5GHz network (160MHz, OFDMA enabled) and, upstream, I measured an average of 938Mbps at 5 feet and 363Mbps at 30 feet. The main body is 260.2 mm wide, 135 mm deep, and 41.6 mm high, with four external antennae. The suggested utilization environment for a detached home is three floors, four stories for an apartment, and a maximum of 42 units. The unit is expected to be priced under 79 USD/EUR.
Specs wise, the router is powered by a Dual Core CPU with 512MB RAM, Beamforming technology, High Power FEM, OFDMA, FEM, and also the latest WPA3. The idea is to simulate these types of traffic on all client devices at the same time, and it can be two or more variations at the same time on a single client device (for example, 4K streaming, while the user navigates the web as well, furiously). I didn’t use iperf, but relied on the open-source tools developed by Mr. Jim Salter, netburn which creates the traffic simulations and the net-hydra which runs multiple instances of netburn on the set client devices (it relies on SSH to accomplish it). Following the saga of testing the wireless routers in a better way than just relying on the single-client tests (which are the easy way out for most publications), I decided to put a second TP-Link router (the Archer AX5400) through the hurdles of the multi-client stress test. And yes, the principle is the same as it was with the TP-Link AX3200, the ASUS GT-AX6000 and the TUF-AX5400– we connect five client devices to a server computer and then simulate various types of traffic (at the moment, I have simulated 4K and 1080p streaming, web browsing and VoIP).
It’s also worth mentioning that I tried to keep the same distance between the client devices and the server (same as when testing the other wireless routers), but since distance means little, I decided to share the attenuation that was detected at the client level. The ZimaBoard 832 is positioned the farthest since it’s connected to a TV (it works as an alternative to the built-in computer) and the signal strength is -65dB, while the other four clients sit in the same room as the TP-Link AX5400 – the attenuation was -33dB for the WiFi 6E PC and it ranged between -38 and -43dB for the other three client devices. 4K and 1080p Streaming – 5 Client Devices AX3000 speeds break down to 574Mbps at 2.4GHz and 2,402Mbps at 5GHz. Both of these routers can deliver plenty of speed for most people, but the extra headroom that comes with AX3000 will be good for those that want to do more local networking. I rarely had problems opening the case of any TP-Link routers, so the tear-down process of the TP-Link AX73 is not that difficult. Do be aware that even if there aren’t any sealed screws, you can still void the warranty by opening the device. If that’s fine with you, remove the four screws from underneath the four silicone feet and then gently detach the top cover. It’s not that easy to do it, so I suggest using a prying tool and start from the front side of the case and then slowly move towards the rear until the top pops off.
The real good network gear uses their own chips. Aka just licenced designs from arm. Since that allows them the most flexibility.It’s worth mentioning the OFDMA implementation should be up/dl on both bands, but so far, the manufacturer hasn’t disclosed whether the Archer AX50 does supports OFDMA dl/ul on the 2.4Ghz band. So, as you can see, the focus is now towards a better handling of the bandwidth, as well as of multiple clients, while the throughput may seem to take a secondary priority. Adding RE605X to the network controlled by AX55 was easy with WPS. I simply had to press the WPS buttons on the two devices to let them pair up on their own. Here are the details on my wireless network signal strength around the house after adding the RE605X: A final feature worth mentioning is OneMesh, which lets you pair the AX53 with other TP-Link routers to create an extended network. It’s a tempting option for a router like this, as it means you can grow your network organically by adding low-cost extenders as needed, while retaining the convenience of managing everything from a single dashboard.
To put my performance figures into context, Zoom recommends that you need only 4Mbits/sec for a video call – equivalent to 0.5MB/sec – and even streaming 4K UHD video from Disney Plus only requires 25Mbits/sec, or just over 3MB/sec. In other words, the Miracle router proved perfectly fast enough to allow multiple family members to watch videos and chat online at once. You can manage the AX50 with the TP-Link Tether mobile app for Android and iOS devices, or you can use the web console. Both are easy to use, but the web console offers a few more advanced options such as DHCP Server, NAT Forwarding, Firewall, and IPv6 settings. The 802.11ax white paper defines standardized modifications to both the IEEE 802.11 physical layers (PHY) and the IEEE 802.11 Medium Access Control (MAC) layer as enabling at least one mode of operation capable of supporting improvement of at least four times the average throughput per station (measured at the MAC data service access point) in a dense deployment scenario.
Blazingly Fast Gigabit Speed Can't Wait
Yet the ZTE still has its appeal. It’s attractive to look at, and not unpleasant to use, as long as you don’t expect too much from the app. Yes, there are any number of faster routers, but for a medium-sized household with medium-sized internet demands it’ll do a fine job. On the rear side of the TP-Link AX73, there are four buttons, one for turning Off/On the LEDs, one for enabling the WPS process, one for turning On/Off the WiFi and the last one is a recessed Reset button (press and hold it for about 10 seconds to return the router to its default settings). Further to the right, there are four LAN ports (all Gigabit), one WAN port (also Gigabit), a Power button and a Power connector. On the right side of the AX73, there’s a single USB 3.0 port for adding a printer or an external storage device. Internal Hardware To test file-transfer performance, we move a 1.5GB folder containing a mix of music, video, photo, and document files between a USB drive and a wired desktop PC, both directly connected to the router, and time its read and write speeds. The Archer AX50 managed a write speed of 42MBps, which is decent, but not as fast as the Asus RT-AX86U (52 MBps) or the Linksys MR-7350 (74MBps). On the read test, the AX50 garnered a faster 44MBps, but that still couldn’t match the RT-AX86U (66MBps) or the MR-7350 (80Mbps). I see people referring to 2.4GHz and 5GHz as “2 different networks”. This is incorrect unless, for some specific reason, you either have VLANs linked to certain bands or you’re running a very advanced WLAN setup. READ NEXT: The very best Wi-Fi 6 routers currently available ZTE Miracle AX3000 Pro review: Price and competition
Great Deal 
New Comment