The Identicals

Product Information

Apparently, some reviewers may seem to think this is some sort of techno futurist art statement film piece, probing an uncharted realm suggested by parallel existence pathways in an emergent world. The application of Leibniz's law is erroneous; the law is only applicable in cases of monadic, not polyadic, properties; or Masked-man fallacy– Formal fallacy when one makes an illicit use of Leibniz's law in an argument, a fallacious use of this principle

Principle should be accepted only in the following qualified form: There cannot be two or more indiscernible things with all Rosenkrantz, Gary S. (1979). "The Pure and the Impure". Logique et Analyse. 22 (88): 515–523. ISSN 0024-5836. JSTOR 44085165. Therefore Superman has a property that Clark Kent does not have, namely that Lois Lane thinks that he can fly.THERE WAS A PUG NAMED LUCY BEAN! But I was pissed that the other dog didn’t like her and she was portrayed as annoying. My pugs rarely bark and Fish is a super dumb name for a dog (417). Still, this book especially peaked my interest as I have (young) twin daughters. I was pleasantly surprised by the plot and quite captivated by the book. It's a perfect beach read. Obviously you're not going to find a literary masterpiece, but if you're looking for escape, it's perfect. The plot is exciting, the characters complex enough (and up to their elbows in trouble), and the summery location makes you feel as if you're at the beach, experiencing the crazy gossip as it happens. I found myself quite drawn to all the characters--which doesn't always happen in novels like this--and especially liked headstrong teenage Ainsley and poor Harper, who just can't seem to get her life together. In a universe of two distinct objects A and B, all predicates F are materially equivalent to one of the following properties: Parent Trap vibes with an adult twist…One of Hilderbrand's most binge-worthy confections."—Elisabeth Egan, New York Times

People appear out of nowhere with little explanation, threats are made to the main characters with little cause, and then there's an organization that appears to want to control some element of society, but we never know exactly who they are or their motivation. And then the end comes and ..... Summer isn’t official to me until I’ve read Hilderbrand’s latest book and when I saw that The Identicals was a book about sisters, I was pretty excited. Sister relationships always intrigue me, but a book about twin sisters is even more appealing to me, there’s just something fascinating about the bond they share and the unspoken connection between them. Full of Hilderbrand’s trademark style, this book delivered on all levels and I think it’s the author at her best. The awful parenting that Hilderbrand often includes in her books. Is she an awful parent and is trying to make others feel like they’re not alone, or is she trying to make me so frustrated that I don’t reproduce?! Any parent who is too weary of their child’s possible reaction to discipline should not have kids. Identicals does deserve some credit for its stylistic motif, a uniquely strange mix of future and retro tech ambiance, and the lovely Nora-Jane No one is quite fun to watch as Nadia . . . but still, this film just doesn't quite fit all the pieces together well enough to deliver its entire message coherently. I try and give low-budget sci-fi films more leeway to see without costly special effects if some nuggets of cleverness or originality can be found. Unfortunately, what I saw here came across as way too murky, obtuse, and nonsensical, for my tastes.Since in proposition6 we come to a contradiction with proposition2, we conclude that at least one of the premises is wrong. Either: How different can twins really be? Is their relationship really all that complicated? The answer is a resounding yes!