Cream for my Wife: A Lesbian Hucow Transformation and Breast Expansion Fantasy (Project: Lactis Alpha Book 5)

Product Information

This allowed us to examine the effect of breast cancer timing on the associations between life course factors and coping.

Having children mediated the association between lesbian identity and anxious preoccupation (H1), but only among women diagnosed at younger ages (H3). is reproduced from this report and shows the age-related distribution of breast cancer prevalence in LB women from the six surveys combined, compared to similar results from the NHANES III study (sample size approximately 9000 women). Probit regression coefficients were used to estimate the associations between sexual identity and the binary mediators ( e. There were twenty included studies using a variety of study designs to estimate prevalence, risk and local population incidence rates. Even when cost is not a factor, previous or feared negative responses from health care providers keep too many lesbians from seeking routine screenings.Although the recruitment strategy is not clear, it seems likely that participants were recruited on the basis of being lesbians with breast cancer, or with an interest in breast cancer. Conversely, college education mediated the association between lesbian identity and cognitive avoidance among women diagnosed at older ages (H2).

g., “I am determined to beat this disease”) subscales measure adaptive coping cognitions related to a positive reflection on one's life and a sense of optimism. g., parenting and education) in explicating the association between sexual identity and coping responses. Differential patterns of risk factors for early-onset breast cancer by ER status in African American women. Meads CA, Ahmed I, Riley R: A systematic review of breast cancer incidence risk prediction models with meta-analysis of their performance. Very little information is available in the paper about how the studies were identified and conducted and how their results were analysed.That said, we recognize that some lesbian, gay, bisexual and queer women do not identify as having breasts, feel ambivalent about having breasts or perhaps prefer the term “chest. It was noticeable in the abstract and conclusions that mention was made of the differences in risk factors for breast cancer between lesbians and heterosexual women but not the similarity in breast cancer rates.

In Dibble (2004) [ 23] the sample is limited to lesbians who had a heterosexual sister, as discussed previously. than heterosexual women, and were more likely to have mastectomy without reconstructive surgery (33. The only realistic way to establish rates in LB women would be to collect sexual orientation within routine statistics, including cancer registry data, or from large cohort studies.lists studies assessing the percentages of individual risk factors in LB women compared to heterosexual women where risk models were not used to combine results. The differences in coping that we identified were largely driven by the variation among women diagnosed at younger versus older ages (H3). Women with minor children and who were diagnosed before 45 years of age had higher scores on anxious preoccupation after adjusting for all other variables.

Cross-sectional telephone surveys were completed among self-identified lesbian ( n = 330) and heterosexual ( n = 595) women who were diagnosed with breast cancer. Similarly, income and education were significantly associated with cognitive avoidance and sexual identity; however, income and college education (one of the mediators) were strongly correlated; so only education was included in multivariate analyses. Unfortunately, the results of the survey that had asked about breast cancer in the previous year were not reported in the journal article and the original report was no longer available, (Personal communication, Anne Pinchak, Houston Lesbian Health Initiative, February 2010). Frisch M, Smith E, Grulich A, Johansen C: Cancer in a population- based cohort of men and women in registered homosexual partnerships. CM devised, conducted and wrote the original systematic review as her Master’s Degree in Public Health Dissertation.or 210,800) of these survivors identify as lesbian/gay or bisexual, which we define as sexual minorities. e., the Mini-Mental Adjustment to Cancer [Mini-MAC]) was used to measure the following five dimensions of coping: (1) Helplessness–Hopelessness; (2) Anxious Preoccupation; (3) Cognitive Avoidance; (4) Fighting Spirit; and (5) Fatalism. Sample size – power depends on number of events so if a general population sample needs large numbers or long follow up or both. The Health of Lesbian, gay, Bisexual and Transgender People: Building a Foundation for Better Understanding.