Joined in 2023 
82 
63 About this deal
I have to make a living. Donations from awesome, good-looking users like you buy me time to keep things running. Somehow, I am not totally convinced that, as you say “all healing practices ” work through the use of “frequencies”. Really? So if I understood your statement and logic correctly, conditions like salmonella i Users report a wide range of benefits including more energy, greater well-being, weight loss, increased muscle tone, smoother skin, reduced pain, improved circulation and more. The branch of mathematics dealing with probability was originally developed in relation to gambling, but it is applicable to any situation where there are random influences. This is very much the case when it comes to the behaviour of disease, and indeed many more areas of life than most people are aware of.
Which is just as well: if weak magnetic fields did have a serious biological impact then merely existing on this planet (which has a far larger magnetic field) would scramble us all. Because electromagnetism acts equally in both directions, durr. These don’t sound like the trials that I have been involved in. Though I agree with you that there are a lot of bad trials, and a lot of trials where the statistical analysis leaves a lot to be desired. Biofield Tuning effects the electric rhythms in and around the body and therefore can interfere with the performance of some electric medical devices such as pacemakers.” All requiring nothing more than the will and desire to heal and stay healthy and an extra hour or so of your morning…. no medicine.. no doctors.. no pharmaceuticals ..just pure, inward directing of the internal energy resources abundant and present in EACH OF US..
About Us
I call on the power of Jesus Christ, you are bound and defeated Satan, demons, etc. Leave me now and go to the light!” Without going into personal medical details I’ve been through my fair share of poor health for the past twenty years. I have files of evidence based scientific testing from various countries including UK, Australia, USA, Germany and Switzerland. Throughout this period I’ve met some very good and let’s say very questionable doctors, consultants, therapists etc, from around the world. I’ve tried to keep an open mind to conventional and non conventional treatments. Some helped and others made things worse. Just because science cannot prove it exists does not mean it does not. What science HAS proven is that we see an extremely small amount of color, hear a small range of sounds (also proven by the dog whistle that humans cannot hear but dogs can) and the brain is limited in what it can perceive in the world. Why is it that people that call themselves scientists cannot even allow for ALL possibilities rather than only those that can be witnessed? Until that stops, our global society is going to remain in a modern version of the dark ages in my opinion. Does spontaneous healing only occur after patients are treated with CAM ? We know it occurs. We know that MD’s attribute spontaneous healing phenom when they can’t explain why a patient recovered, by why is I never ever never ever hear MD’s assume that a patient experienced a spontaneous healing after treating them. Do MD’s just always assume that their magic powers and magic pills were effective ? As an oncologist I have often had to talk people through the decision whether or not to have adjuvant chemotherapy. For instance, most people with muscle-invasive bladder cancer are cured by surgery alone, but some of them aren’t, and if you give chemotherapy then there is an absolute risk reduction of about 8%. This means that for every 12 patients treated, most don’t need the chemo because they will be cured anyway, some will die regardless, but for that one person in 12 the chemo makes a life-or-death difference. Clearly if I treat everybody then I know that I am saving some lives, but I don’t know who they will be, and given the toxicity of chemotherapy it is not so obvious that it is the right decision for an individual.
How is this ‘biofield’ related to a person’s health? Even if a biofield would actually exist, this does not necessarily mean that it is in any way related to the state of health of a person. For comparison: every person has a property called ‘weight’ (or more precisely: mass), but barring extreme obesity or emaciation, someone’s weight says nothing in particular about their health. Certainly, the fact that the existence of something is not yet proven does not mean that it does not exist – if its influence can be reliably detected in an indirect way, then its existence can be inferred, even if it is provisional. The most prominent example of this is dark matter. This mysterious type of matter has never been directly observed in any scientific way, but its existence is assumed because of the unexpected way that galaxies rotate (i.e. way too fast considering their visible mass), and no other explanation for this truly universal anomaly has been found so far.Your definition of Evidence bothers me. Simply ignoring peoples own testimony is rude, inhumane, and is setting up mankind for extinction. The problem is that personal experience does not mean anything. There are several mechanisms that can contribute to a very strong illusion(*) that something works: Runners: These are less common now, but runners have the classic sled look (think: Rosebud from Citizen Kane). They’re made from wood and typically have metal runners below. With all this science – sorry, pseudo-science – you must not forget to remain firmly grounded in tradition. Your treatment ought to be based on ancient wisdom which you have rediscovered, modified and perfected. I recommend mentioning that some of the oldest cultures of the planet have already been aware of the main pillars on which your invention today proudly stands. Anything that is that old has stood the test of time which is to say, your treatment is both effective and safe. None of these questions is answered in any scientifically acceptable way. Which is why the whole concept of a ‘biofield’ can be safely dismissed until these answers are provided.
Galileo could not use any of the tools available during his time to measure what he “felt” to be true and so had to invent new means to prove his assumptions so too, the new consciousness scientists need new tools to do the same. Like it or not, but we live in an age where we cannot entirely exclude science from our considerations. At the very minimum, I recommend a little smattering of sciency terminology. As you don’t want to be found out, select something that only few experts understand; quantum physics, entanglement, chaos-theory and Nano-technology are all excellent options. Something truly ‘far out’ would be ideal, like claiming the ear is a map of the human body which allows you to treat all diseases by doing something odd on specific areas of the ear – oops, this territory is already occupied by the ear acupuncture brigade. How about postulating that you have super-natural powers which enable you to send ‘healing energy’ into patients’ bodies so that they can repair themselves? No good either: Reiki-healers might accuse you of plagiarism. above this level, even if you can’t hear much – especially in the high range, where your hearing is the most fragile. Sonic Heroes Puzzle (2004) · Sonic Mega Collection Plus Mini (2004) · Sonic the Hedgehog (2004) · Shadow the Hedgehog Flash (2005) · Sonic the Hedgehog CHAOS CRUSH! (2006) · Sonic Rivals Dash (2006) · Sonic Maze Craze (2007) Sonic Rush Adventure Flash (2007) · Sonic Chronicles: The Dark Brotherhood (2008)Since we have no idea how many people with chronic problems have biofield tuning without an immediate response, we have no way of calculating in advance what the chance of this happening is in an individual case, or indeed happening at all. However, even if we could, these are the wrong questions. What we actually want to know is what is the chance that biofield tuning was responsible for the outcome in this case, rather than a different explanation, and more generally, what is the probability that biofield tuning is an effective treatment for chronic conditions. So, a study was able to prove that 55% of the study group met the endpoints … doc, why not one hundred percent ? You already gave me the answer not long ago…. because not everybody responds the same to ANY therapy ! So if a given synthetic drug is given approval, it doesn’t mean that it will benefit all patients. Therefore, studies that fall short of being able to benefit all patients do not mean the therapy is not valid at all, it means the therapy is beneficial for a smaller number of patients than the powers that be require to give it the stamp of approval. This magic stamp of approval apparently mean to and you your EBM cohort that it is SCIENCE and therefore it must be revered and accepted. And if any given therapy does not acquire that magic stamp of approval from the powers that be, the therapy is completely invalid. HOGWASH ! Why is it a scam? Did you try it? The us military studied it for over 40 yrs…eastern medicine used it 4 times as long as “proven” medicine… isn’t that same proven medicine the same that comes with a slew of side effects and then a law suit down the line… science fiction just isn’t science fact because we haven’t learned the how… this doesn’t change the truth… you can’t get wet by the word water… call it Biofield, call it god , call it the universe science HAS PROVEN ITS EXISTENCE. Just as in centuries past, new tools need to be developed to measure these new discoveries and we are still in the stone age in terms of measuring events that occur in the vibrational, wave behaviour consciousness energy field. The reason for this is that Biofield Tuning moves stagnation in the body, resulting in a detox response in up to 50% of those who experience it. This detox can surface as extreme exhaustion, waves of emotion, or other detox symptoms such as body aches, mucus, rashes, etc.”
Great Deal 
New Comment